Pinnacle has a team of litigation support consultants who have testified and helped prepare testimony for dozens of administrative hearings on issues such as loss and expense reserve adequacy, reinsurance recoverables, pricing adequacy and many other areas for insurance companies and regulators. Using our experience and expertise, we are ready to help you, regardless of the challenges you face.

Pinnacle has several consultants who have appeared as expert witnesses at arbitrations. We are also trained to serve as insurance and reinsurance arbitrators.

Benchmarking is useful in loss reserving and ratemaking assignments from at least two perspectives. First, to the extent a program’s loss development data is not of sufficient size to be fully reliable, benchmarks are needed to supplement the information to make reliable estimates of unpaid claims liabilities. Second, once an analysis is complete, benchmarking your program’s results to others (i.e., competitors, peer companies or industry aggregates) is useful for comparison purposes.

The benchmarks used to supplement your data are only as good as the nature of the underlying data. A benchmark for commercial auto liability, for instance, may not be predictive of an insurance program for tow truck operators as the former is very broad and the latter is a very narrow business class. Likewise, a benchmark loss development pattern based on countrywide data may not be predictive of future loss emergence of a book of business in California. Pinnacle strives to construct benchmarks for any given analysis as close as possible to replicating the nature of the underlying data being reviewed.
 

Every industry has its terminology or jargon.  Pinnacle provides special interest seminars for attorneys that include loss reserving, ratemaking and valuation to explain key issues and best practices.

Pinnacle has experience working with large datasets and creating models to assess damages and develop scenario outcomes.

Asking the right questions and understanding the answers is key to a successful deposition. Pinnacle consultants are experienced in the often rapid-fire situations presented in depositions.

Assessing the reasonableness of indicated loss and loss adjustment expense reserves after the analysis is completed is an essential element of the loss reserve analysis. In particular, measures such as loss ratios, changes since the prior evaluation, implied claim frequencies and severities and costs per unit of exposure are a few of the diagnostic tests employed when considering the reasonableness of indicated reserves.

Management sometimes wishes to reflect the time value of money in funding projections, accruals for unpaid claims liabilities and other valuations. The two most important parameters for doing so are the assumed interest rate and the underlying claim payment pattern. Assessing reasonable values for these parameters is not trivial as the interest rate may need an adjustment for risk while the claim payment pattern may not be readily available.

Pinnacle consultants have experience in providing expert witness testimony in federal, state and county courts and before state legislatures. We have also defended insurer and bank business practices in complex class action lawsuits.

Pinnacle provides financial examination support to many state insurance departments. This support is usually peer review or independent loss evaluations and loss adjustment expense reserve liabilities.

Ultimate losses in a loss reserve exercise may be broken down into two components – ultimate claim counts and ultimate average claim severities. Claim frequencies are affected by changes in coverage or product line mix or geographic diversity, safety culture, loss control efforts and employee education. Average claim severities typically trend upwards but may be influenced by risk management techniques such as managed care, vendor analysis, and attitudes towards early settlements. Pinnacle can help you review your claims experience to determine potential improvement areas to control rising costs.

Management often desires to be conservative when setting an accrual for unpaid claims liabilities. Routinely we employ a variety of methods to derive indicated accruals for unpaid claims liabilities at a variety of higher confidence levels to help you assess the potential variability in future loss outcomes. Using evaluation methods to reflect process risk, parameter risk and/or model risk, we can help you find out what you need to know about indicated reserves at specified higher levels of statistical confidence.

Since Pinnacle’s consultants have career backgrounds ranging from large to small insurers, regulatory authorities and statistical organizations, Pinnacle delivers a complete perspective to each assignment. Pinnacle’s commitment to the actuarial profession is demonstrated by committee work and leadership positions for actuarial organizations, which keeps us on the cutting edge of professional developments.

The timely reporting requirements of financial results sometimes leads to a mismatch between the evaluation date of the data and the date shown on the financial statement. Projections of claim activity in the next few months are often requested to accommodate such time constraints. The roll forward projection of future expected loss and loss expense reserves is calculated based on interpolated loss and loss expense payment and reporting patterns. The assumption inherent in this approach is that actual claim activity in the roll forward period will not be materially different than projected.

Pinnacle provides “been-there-done-that” perspective that is helpful in preparing witnesses for the unfamiliar and frequently stressful litigation landscape.