FCAS, MAAA, CSPA
Principal and Consulting Actuary

Send email
(309) 807-2330

Download Bio
Download CV


Download vCard

Industries

Customers

Roosevelt C. Mosley Jr.

Roosevelt Mosley is a Principal and Consulting Actuary with Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc. and has 22 years of property and casualty actuarial experience. His skill set includes predictive analytics applications for all insurance functions, ratemaking and product development, competitive analysis and litigation support. Roosevelt is a Fellow of the Casualty Actuarial Society (FCAS), a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries (MAAA) and holds the designation of Certified Specialist in Predictive Analytics (CSPA). He serves as the Vice President of Marketing and Communications for the CAS. In addition, he serves on the American Academy of Actuaries (AAA) Auto Issues Committee and the Price Optimization Task Force. He has also served as a member of the Board of Directors of the CAS, the Board of Directors of the International Association of Black Actuaries, and CAS and AAA Governance Task Forces.

Publications and Media

February 2017 APEX Discussion Series
Using Predictive Analytics to Understand Your Claims Process
Authored by Linda K. Brobeck and Michael K. Chen and Roosevelt C. Mosley Jr..

November 17, 2016 APEX Discussion Series
Predictive Analytics: How Do You Choose From a Sea of Options?
Authored by Thomas R. Kolde and Roosevelt C. Mosley Jr..

See More »

Case Studies

Colorado Automobile No-Fault Impact Analyses

Colorado Automobile No-Fault Impact Analyses

Pinnacle Actuarial Resources prepared an independent actuarial analysis on behalf of the Colorado Auto Insurance Working Group to determine the cost implications of changes to the Colorado no-fault law. One of the scenarios analyzed was the complete repeal of the no-fault law, replacing it with medical payments coverage.

The analysis employed data from a recent study by the Insurance Research Council (IRC) to assess the impact of a $2,500 economic loss threshold relative to BI losses. Loss and trend information from the Fast-Track monitoring system was reviewed to estimate the impact of implementing no-fault systems from other jurisdictions. Moreover, the Fast Track data was evaluated to assess the impact on costs of other jurisdictions that had previously repealed their no-fault systems.

Lastly, the indicated cost estimates for the state of Colorado were compared to those of tort states in order to assess the reasonableness of the study’s outcomes. The results from this study were used to support rate filings of several of our clients in support of the reforms.

Minnesota Automobile No-Fault Impact Analyses

Minnesota Automobile No-Fault Impact Analyses

The Insurance Federation of Minnesota retained Pinnacle in 2006 to conduct an independent actuarial study to determine the possible cost implications of changing Minnesota’s current no-fault law. The scenarios were:

  • A complete repeal of the no-fault law, which would be replaced with a tort system including mandatory liability insurance. We also priced first party medical payments benefits of $2,500, $5,000 and $10,000 as replacements for current personal injury protection (PIP) benefits.
  • Implementing a medical fee schedule. This option would consider two different fee schedules: the Minnesota Worker’s Compensation fee schedule, and 115% of the Medicare fee schedule.
  • Introducing a Michigan-style verbal threshold implementation with several PIP limit options.
  • Capping treatments on soft tissue injuries to $2,500.
  • Making alternative care optional for an additional premium.
  • Reducing the PIP benefit limit from $20,000 each for the separate medical and non-medical limits (with $40,000 of coverage total) to $10,000 for each separate sub-limit. This would also include an additional $10,000 of coverage for “trauma care.” 

Personal Lines

Personal Lines

Pinnacle was approached by a national insurer that wanted to develop a more sophisticated homeowners rating program. Their current homeowners plan was a traditional rating approach and was only based on a few factors, and the company felt they were not taking full advantage of the potential in the homeowners market. Pinnacle, through the use of predictive modeling, assisted the carrier in designing a new rating and tiering structure, which included the introduction of by-peril rating and new territory definitions. This new structure allowed the company to be more precise in rating homeowners, resulting in more adequate and competitive rates for a broader spectrum of risks.

Start a Conversation

At Pinnacle, we partner with you to explore whatever path it takes to find the answers you need.

Learn More


In the news

From the Blog