Derek W. Freihaut
Robert J. Walling III
Jordan R. Paszek
Joseph A. Herbers
Aaron N. Hillebrandt
Darcie R. Truttmann
Erich A. Brandt
Timothy C. Mosler
Arthur R. Randolph II
Laura A. Maxwell
Nicholas E. Alicea
Christina L. Negley
Travis G. Murnan
Pinnacle is awesome to work with. Their work is accurate and response time is extremely fast!
Pinnacle helps alternative market risk owners, captive managers and service providers determine risk retentions that optimize the balance between the cost of risk transfer and loss volatility.
Pinnacle has consultants who are experienced as expert witnesses in arbitrations and also ARIAS-certified arbitrators.
Pinnacle consultants deal with auditors daily, assisting them in serving their customers and evaluating the work products of other actuaries.
Pinnacle strives to construct benchmarks for any analysis, whether ratemaking, loss reserving or some other use, as close as possible to replicating the nature of the underlying data being reviewed.
Pinnacle can assist you in controlling your property
catastrophe exposure by determining the impact of policy changes, including
deductibles, or reviewing geographic areas where exposures are driving your
Self-insurance programs, which allow companies to pay some portion of their insurable loss exposures, come in all shapes, sizes and types. Multinational corporations, single state operations, large deductible and retrospectively rated policies, risk retention groups (RRGs), and captives — including 831(b)s, single parent captives, segregated cells, and group captives — all play critical roles.
As nationally-respected experts in alternative markets, Pinnacle provides a full range of actuarial services to a wide variety of self-insureds, including traditional loss reserve analysis for exposure within deductibles or self-insured retentions. We can compare alternate program structures, analyze retention levels and develop feasibility study documents, along with a wide range of other services.
Our expertise comes from having a team of experienced consultants with deep understanding of the challenges self insureds face, but also with the local knowledge unique to individual market segments, such as:
As well, we are well versed in the intricacies of mechanisms for alternative markets structures, including:
May 14 2020 APEX
Actuarial 101 for Self-Insured Entities
Authored by Ken J. Hawkins.
April 2018 APEX Webinar
Actuarial 101 for Self-Insured Entities
Authored by Nicholas E. Alicea.
See More »
Pinnacle was approached by an aircraft manufacturer to provide recommended funding for various aviation and liability coverages. Pinnacle’s initial steps included discussing coverages to be provided and what data was available to complete the funding study. The captive was a start-up with no loss information on which to determine appropriate funding levels. Pinnacle was able to determine that the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) had a database of aircraft incidents that recorded both the manufacturer and model of the aircraft involved in the incident. Since the manufacturer was able to provide the number of units produced, Pinnacle was able to determine the frequency and severity of the incidents and project ultimate funding levels. The captive is currently operational after receiving regulatory approval.
Reinsurance Price Optimization
Pinnacle was approached by an insurance company to provide an independent review of their reinsurance program. The first step was to review historic ceded premiums and losses by treaty layer to determine the overall reinsurer profitability. Pinnacle then independently priced the existing reinsurance program to benchmark the current market pricing. Finally, Pinnacle provided a cost benefit analysis to help the client determine the optimal retention levels for its insurance program. With this information in hand and our support, our client was able to negotiate better terms for their reinsurance program.
Self Insured Loss Reserve Analysis
Pinnacle was approached by a major, national manufacturer to perform a loss reserve analysis of their retained workers compensation, auto liability, general liability and products liability loss exposures. The previous actuary worked for a large broker which the customer felt presented a conflict of interest. In addition, the actuary used industry benchmarks that the customer felt did not accurately represent their loss development behavior. Pinnacle worked with the customer to better understand their loss exposures, claims handling practices, and corporate risk management philosophy. We worked with the company to gather better internal data and refine the industry benchmarks to better reflect their third party administrator, industry focus and geographic mix. These refinements, and many others, led to a more accurate analysis of the company’s retained loss exposures, a reduced provision for unpaid claims on their balance sheet, and reduced collateral requirements from their fronting carrier.
At Pinnacle, we partner with you to explore whatever path it takes to find the answers you need.
October 20, 2021
Financial Reporting Insurance (FINREP) Forum
October 21, 2021
October APEX Webinar -
An Update to Pinnacle’s Risk Retention Group Benchmarking Study