FCAS, MAAA, CERA Principal and Consulting Actuary
Send email (309) 807-2320
Download Bio Download CV
Download vCard
“Ch-ch-ch-ch-Changes (Turn and Face the Strange)” Oct 10, 2017
Disruptive Medical Technology is Changing Lives (Including Mine) Jan 25, 2017
Puerto Rico – A Domicile on the Move Nov 30, 2016
See all »
March 2019 APEX Webinar 2018 Risk Retention Group Benchmarking Study Authored by Erich A. Brandt and Gregory W. Fears, Jr. and Robert J. Walling III.
2018 Risk Retention Group Benchmarking Study 2018 RRG Benchmarking Study - *Sign in required to view* Authored by Erich A. Brandt and Gregory W. Fears, Jr. and Robert J. Walling III.
See More »
Legislative / Regulatory Impacts
A state medical society asked Pinnacle to evaluate the impact of a change in the state’s damage caps for non-economic damages for medical professional liability. Pinnacle worked with the medical society to identify the most appropriate claims databases to assess the legislation’s potential impact. Our detailed analysis not only considered data from that state, but several others to stress test the results and provide a range of reasonable outcomes. In addition, we performed a thorough analysis of how the state compared to other states in terms of the availability and affordability of medical professional liability insurance coverage, insurer operating results for the line, and access to healthcare in the states. Through this industry analysis, we identified differences well beyond a simple loss limitation and provide a more complete review of potential environmental changes that could be expected in the state.
Retention Analysis
Pinnacle was asked by a large self-insured regional transportation authority to assess the impact of increasing their self-insured retentions for both workers compensation and automobile liability. We developed a stochastic simulation analysis, based on the program’s historical claims experience and industry benchmarks, that examined not only the increase in expected losses but the program’s additional potential loss variability. Finally, we discussed with the customer the relationship between their current capital position, as well as the current reinsurance market, to ensure the retention they selected for their program was appropriate for them. The authority ultimately increased their retentions, put some of their excess capital to work, and realized substantial savings in their reinsurance costs.
Self Insured Dividend / Assessment Analysis
A large group self insurance program was concerned with the amount of retained earnings and wanted to establish a policy for the minimum capital for the program to trigger dividend distributions. Pinnacle compared the program’s capitalization to a wide variety of industry standards for similar programs from rating agencies, regulators, and other sources. The results of this analysis lead to a recommended board policy regarding a minimum capital threshold for dividend distributions and ultimately to the development of an actuarially sound dividend distribution plan.
At Pinnacle, we partner with you to explore whatever path it takes to find the answers you need.
Learn More
March 25, 2019 CAS Ratemaking, Product and Modeling (RPM) Seminar
April 08, 2019 CSIA Annual Meeting